Charlamagne Calls Out Trump with Donkey of the Day and Debunks His Claims
Charlamagne: Donkey of the Day Against TrumpIn an effort to clarify his take on Donald Trump, Charlamagne, a former hedge fund manager and self-proclaimed "God" (as he calls him), has taken down Trump with the same donkey of the day—by calling out his misinformation in a metaphorical way. While Charlamagne's take can sometimes be comically off-putting, it also serves as a reminder of how easily people can manipulate and confuse each other about complex issues like politics, economics, and foreign policy.
### 1. The Economy: Trump's False Claims on Growth
Charlamagne has clearly labeled Donald Trump with his donkey of the day by dismissing his claims about the economy. He mocks Trump for claiming that the U.S. economic recovery has stalled because he attributes it to his "insult" on Truth Social—specifically, the mention of a donkey named Donkey of the Day. Charlamagne takes this comment out of context and suggests that Trump's statements about the economy are entirely false.
One of the most glaring examples of this is Trump's claims that the U.S. economy has " stalled" in recent months. Trump has consistently said that the economy hasn't been shrinking, which contradicts numerous data points from Federal Reserve officials, economic analysts, and reputable sources like the National Center for Environmental Information (NCBI) and the Organization of Economic Cooperation (OECD). Charlamagne, however, dismisses these facts by framing them as "economic growth" claims made by someone else—such as a former Fed official named Donkey of the Day.
Another key point of contention between Trump and Charlamagne is his claim that the U.S. job creation rate has slowed down. Trump asserts that this is true, citing numbers from the Department of Labor, which are widely considered reliable. However, Charlamagne counters by pointing out that these numbers reflect "unemployment" rather than actual job creation. This mismatch between Trump's statements and reality has been a recurring theme throughout his campaign.
### 2. Debunking Epstein's Report
In addition to dismissing Trump's economic claims, Charlamagne has also taken down the credibility of his source for additional insights—John A. Epstein, who previously worked as U.S. Treasury Secretary from 1980 until 2005. While Epstein was involved in significant policy decisions, including the 9/11 attacks and the stimulus programs for the U.S., Charlamagne has taken a stand against his report.
According to Charlamagne, Epstein wrote a report titled "The End of Economic Growth" in December 2023 before Trump took office. However, this report was later retracted by the Department of the Treasury due to concerns about its accuracy and the lack of evidence for its claims. Even if Epstein's report were taken seriously, it has clear flaws. For example, he suggested that the U.S. economy had shrunk since the 1980s, a claim that is deeply false based on decades of economic data.
### 3. Addressing Trump's Job Claims
In addition to his criticism of Trump's economic claims, Charlamagne has also addressed some of his other major policy accusations—such as his claim about trade wars and his visitation to China—and has gone after him for the same reasons: specifically, that he has used metaphors like donkeys (which is clearly a bad metaphor) but still misguides people by dismissing Trump's credibility.
For example, Charlamagne has taken down Trump's claims that U.S.-associated companies are engaging in "triple-zero" trade deals—where they have closed all international supply chains and only source internally. He argues that this idea is entirely false, calling it a "plan for the sale of a donkey" by Trump.
Similarly, he has criticized Trump for saying that China's policies in its oil industry are beneficial to U.S. jobs. However, according to Charlamagne, these statements have been spun by individuals who worked at China's top defense officials before Trump took office. In fact, many of China's largest companies were already based in the U.S. when Trump came on board, which means that China's oil policies were actually not beneficial for U.S. jobs.
### 4. Conclusion
Charlamagne's take on Trump is obviously aimed at a certain audience—those who he deems "good guys" and those he sees as anti-competitive. While his commentary often uses metaphors like donkeys to highlight his missteps, it can also serve as a way of dismissing the information that Trump has available.
In any case, Charlamagne's article is only as helpful as the facts it addresses. While his take on Trump's economy and other issues may seem dismissive in parts, they do contribute to a broader discussion about the credibility of U.S. policymakers and the importance of seeking out information before drawing conclusions based on hearsay.
As we look ahead, it will be interesting to see how Charlamagne balances his focus on economics with his broader stance on U.S. policy. Whether or not he ultimately wins any points, it is clear that he has clearly made a point about Trump's misinformation—either through his metaphorical donkey of the day or his outright dismissals of his claims.
------
#Entertainment
